Fair marking depends on clear criteria and a shared understanding of academic standards. This workshop explored how lecturers can apply assessment criteria consistently and use moderation to review marking decisions. It focused on recognizing differences in judgement between markers and addressing them to support valid and reliable assessment outcomes. The program also emphasized maintaining consistency within student groups and across different assessment periods. By encouraging staff to examine how marking decisions are made, the workshop aimed to strengthen assessment quality and give students greater confidence that their work is evaluated fairly.